Summary - SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce recently discussed the SEC regulatory approaches and how these approaches can best suit today’s markets and technology. Commissioner Peirce suggested ways in which the SEC can make it easier for investors, whether on their own or with the help of financial professionals, to plan for their futures and avoid predictable investment pitfalls that too many Americans encounter. Peirce provided her thoughts on ways the SEC can facilitate fund adaptation of technological and other innovations to better serve investors and provide them with a wider selection of investment choices.
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce recently discussed the SEC's efforts on derivatives and derivative dealers regulation. Peirce discussed the remaining derivative dealer regulations rulemaking outstanding and indicated that "the immediate task is to take the steps necessary to stand up our dealer regime. I believe we need to finalize these three remaining rules expeditiously. I also believe we need to make some adjustments in other areas, including, in some cases, rules that have already been finalized, to ensure that dealers are able to register and come into compliance with the relevant Title VII requirements in a way that avoids unnecessary market disruption. In my view, once we have completed this work, we will need to turn to the task of getting transactions reported and disseminated to the public.
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce recently spoke to a group of law students covering a number of topics, including digital assets and the SEC. Hester indicated that in her "short time as a commissioner, innovations such as blockchain, cryptocurrencies, and digital assets have moved from technological novelties to policy flashpoints. Technology has continually reshaped, and often immeasurably improved, our lives from the beginning of human history. The capital markets are no exception. They have been the origin of some technological innovations and heavy users of others. Technology in the capital markets, though, is often derided as a source of problems, not a place to look for solutions. I hope that, with careful—but not paralyzing— deliberation, we at the SEC can foster an environment in which truly useful developments can flourish without either undue intrusion on our part, or, of course, undue harm to investors or other market actors. Once again, we must not fall into the trap of substituting our regulatory judgment about which technologies will succeed in transforming our markets for the judgment of people in the marketplace."
Peirce went on to caution that new technologies could upend, among other things, how securities transactions are conducted, how companies are governed, and the way retail investors engage in the financial markets. For those concerned about “wolves” in the financial industry preying on retail investors, new technologies offer great promise. Technological change is leading to better products and services for retail investors, greater ease for investors seeking to trade and monitor their investments, and opportunities for new competitors to challenge the incumbents. Technology, if we allow it, can make the capital markets more competitive and more investor-friendly. Peirce indicated that she is "confident, however, that new technology will make our capital markets work better for investors, open new opportunities for a whole generation of innovators, and enable us as securities regulators to be better at tracking down the wolves and holding them to account."
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Commissioner Kara M. Stein recently spoke about the importance of data to our financial markets. Stein indicated that “the prolific availability of data and information has disrupted and transformed the capital markets. Financial services companies look nothing like they did in the ’20s and ’30s. Stock exchanges, securities brokers and dealers, investment advisers, and other key participants in the securities markets now look and act more like technology companies. In fact, today’s investors may only interact with a software program or smartphone app when making investment decisions or executing transactions.” Stein cautioned that it “makes sense that these transformative changes are provoking new and complicated questions about data ownership, use, availability, and protection. In order to oversee the financial markets with insight and intelligence, the Commission I am a member of, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission needs to start grappling with some of the potential answers to these questions.”
Topics discussed by Stein included:
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce recently spoke about the scope of those considered stakeholders in the corporate setting. Peirce indicated that the phrase stakeholder "is so popular precisely because it is so elastic. In the corporate context, however, that elasticity has some troubling implications. It is used to refocus corporate decision-makers on constituencies other than their shareholders. In the stakeholder-centric view of the world, a corporation and its directors owe a duty not just to shareholders, but to a broader group of ‘stakeholders.’"
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - Stephanie Avakian, Co-Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, recently spoke about the SEC's Enforcement Program performance. Avakian cautioned that he fellow co-director and her "fundamentally reject the premise these analyses embrace – that numbers – standing alone – can adequately measure the success or impact of an enforcement program. Statistics such as the number of actions the SEC brought in a fiscal year and the dollar amount of judgments and orders obtained in that year are interesting so far as they go, but they only tell us so much. Put simply, statistics do not provide a full and meaningful picture of the quality, nature, and effectiveness of the Division’s efforts."
Specific topics covered by Avakian included:
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Commissioner Robert J. Jackson, Jr. recently spoke about the state of America's stock markets. Jackson indicated "that it’s time to put the “exchange” back in the Securities and Exchange Commission. I want to highlight four puzzling practices in today’s markets—the two-tiered system for stock-price information, legal limits on exchange liability when they harm investors, the structure of stock exchanges themselves, and payments exchanges make to brokers who send orders their way—that don’t look like the kind of competition that American investors deserve. And I want to highlight the way forward for us at the SEC."
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce recently spoke about new financial technologies (FinTech) and the need for more nimble regulatory approaches. Peirce indicated that “because most of us regulators are neither entrepreneurs nor technologists, we should respond to attempts to bring innovative solutions into the financial markets with an appropriate degree of humility.”
Peirce cautioned that “an essential step to encouraging innovations in our markets is to provide innovators with greater clarity and certainty in their interactions with the Commission and its staff. Innovators are often reluctant to ask for regulatory permission for fear of getting an adverse response.”
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Chief Accountant Wesley Bricker recently spoke at the AICPA’s National Conference on Banks & Saving Institutions. While Bricker’s comments were directed at financial institutions, other entities may find his remarks informative on the topics of:
Highlights of Bricker’s remarks are provided below.
Implementation of the New Accounting Standards on Credit Losses
Bricker believes “implementation of CECL can result in financial reporting that better reflects management’s expectations and an institution’s credit risk information.” Bricker cautioned that adoption plans for CECL should consider requirements under the federal securities laws and expectations set forth in SEC guidance for preparers to:
The SEC staff guidance included within SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 102 will continue to be relevant, even after being updated to align the concepts to an expected loss measurement that incorporates reasonable and supportable forecasts. These principles include maintaining documentation and supporting evidence to facilitate the review, validation, and audit of that estimate.
Bricker urged active involvement by company audit committees in the implementation of this standard. The audit committee plays a vital role in overseeing a company’s financial reporting, including the implementation of new accounting standards. Anticipated impacts of the standard may need to be communicated externally as well to help avoid surprises. Transition disclosures enable investors to understand the anticipated effects of the new standard.
Digital Asset Activities
Regarding the emergence of digital assets, Bricker indicated that it “is critical that we keep ourselves informed about emerging technologies so that the accounting profession can continue to perform the essential gatekeeper function for issuer compliance related to financial reporting.” Companies must continue to maintain appropriate books and records, regardless of whether distributed ledger technology (such as Blockchain) smart contracts, and other technology-driven applications are (or are not) used. Bricker cautioned that the auditor of an issuer, broker-dealer, or investment adviser is required to determine the nature and extent of the audit procedures to perform based on the circumstances of the entity and the auditing standards applied. Distributed ledger technology and digital assets, despite their exciting possibilities, do not alter the fundamental responsibility of companies to comply with existing requirements of securities laws. Bricker’s remarks included brief illustrative examples of new technologies with consideration of compliance with existing securities laws requirements, including books and records, internal accounting controls, fair value or related party disclosure requirements, and consideration of loss contingencies.
Expanded Auditor’s Report
Bricker provided a brief update on the status of implementation of the PCAOB’s new auditing standard for auditor reports and, in particular, the pending inclusion of critical audit matters (or CAMs) within the auditor’s report. Bricker indicated that the “goal of the new standard is to make the auditor’s report more informative and relevant to investors and other users of the financial statements.” Ongoing dialogue among auditors, audit committees, management, and others, will be critical.
Bricker is pleased to see the PCAOB staff’s update to its guidance for applying the auditor reporting standard and, if needed, encourage the PCAOB to consider further updates as it relates to CAMs. I am also pleased with the level of dialogue including through dry-runs between auditors, audit committees, and management. Bricker noted that these “dry runs can help auditors and audit committees plan for meaningful information specific to the audit to be included in the audit report. Please consider sharing your experiences with the PCAOB staff and with us at the SEC as we monitor the implementation of critical audit matters.”
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Chairman Jay Clayton issued a statement clarifying the authority given to SEC staff views vs. the official rules and regulations issued by the SEC. The SEC staff frequently makes their views known through a variety of communications, including written statements, compliance guides, letters, speeches, responses to frequently asked questions and responses to specific requests for assistance. Clayton cautioned that the SEC’s “longstanding position is that all staff statements are nonbinding and create no enforceable legal rights or obligations of the Commission or other parties.”
Clayton believes that the SEC should keep this important distinction in mind and has directed directors of the Division of Enforcement and the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations to further emphasize this distinction to their staff. Clayton indicated that “our divisions and offices, including but not limited to the Division of Corporation Finance, the Division of Investment Management and the Division of Trading and Markets, have been and will continue to review whether prior staff statements and staff documents should be modified, rescinded or supplemented in light of market or other developments.”
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - SEC Chairman Jay Clayton recently discussed small business capital formation and efforts by the SEC in this area. Clayton indicated that he believes “the SEC should be keenly focused on helping small businesses from coast to coast access capital to grow, create new jobs, and, in turn, provide investors, including our Main Street investors, expanded investment opportunities. That is why we have been reaching out to and engaging with businesses across the country. We also should recognize, in our analysis, the many connections among small, medium and large businesses, long-term investment capital and, importantly, human capital.”
Clayton shared his views on efforts the SEC has undertaken over the last sixteen months that are intended to foster capital formation, and what should be expected from the SEC’s upcoming regulatory agenda. Topics covered by Clayton included:
For more information, click here.
© 2018 CCH Incorporated and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Used with permission.
Summary - The staff in the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance have published a Small Entity Compliance Guide, Amendments to the Smaller Reporting Company Definition. The guide summarizes and explains the rules recently adopted by the SEC to amend the definition of a “Smaller Reporting Company.” The new smaller reporting company definition enables a company with less than $250 million of public float to provide scaled disclosures, as compared to the $75 million threshold under the prior definition. The final rules also expand the definition to include companies with less than $100 million in annual revenues if they also have either no public float or a public float that is less than $700 million. This reflects a change from the revenue test in the prior definition, which allowed companies to provide scaled disclosure only if they had no public float and less than $50 million in annual revenues.
Topics discussed in this compliance guide include:
Summary - SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce recently discussed the SEC’s proposed Regulation Best Interest. This proposal includes standards for broker-dealers and investment advisers providing investment assistance to investors. Proposed Regulation Best Interest requires a broker-dealer when making a recommendation of any securities transaction or investment strategy involving securities to a retail customer, to act in the best interest of the retail customer at the time the recommendation is made without placing the financial or other interest of the broker-dealer ahead of the interest of the retail customer.
In comparing the proposed Regulation Best Interest standard as well as a broker-dealer’s other requirements under the securities laws to an adviser’s fiduciary duty as described in the proposed interpretive release, Peirce indicated that “only two differences stand out. First, an adviser generally has an ongoing duty to monitor over the course of its relationship with its client, while a broker-dealer generally does not. Second, a broker-dealer must either mitigate or eliminate any material financial conflict of interest it may have with its client. An adviser is required only to disclose such a conflict. Rhetoric aside, arguably proposed Regulation Best Interest would subject broker-dealers to an even more stringent standard than the fiduciary standard outlined in the Commission’s proposed interpretation.”
Peirce urged those interested in the proposal to provide feedback to the SEC. Comments on the proposal are due Tuesday, August 7, 2018.
Summary - SEC Chairman Jay Clayton recently spoke about the importance of developing, improving and reinforcing positive culture in our financial institutions. Topics discussed by Clayton included:
Summary - SEC Chief Accountant Wesley Bricker recently spoke about the important role management accountants play within our financial reporting process and the relationship among management, the audit committee, and the auditor. Topics discussed by Bricker included:
Summary - William Hinman, Director of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) recently discussed the application of Federal securities laws to digital asset transactions. Hinman indicated that promoters “in order to raise money to develop networks on which digital assets will operate, often sell the tokens or coins rather than sell shares, issue notes or obtain bank financing. But, in many cases, the economic substance is the same as a conventional securities offering.” Federal securities laws would apply to these types of transactions given that funds are raised with the expectation that the promoters will build their system and investors can earn a return on the instrument.
Hinman’s indicated factors to consider in assessing whether a digital asset is offered as an investment contract and is thus a security. Primarily, consider whether a third party, be it a person, entity or coordinated group of actors, drives the expectation of a return. That question will always depend on the particular facts and circumstances and this list is illustrative, not exhaustive:
Summary - The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) announced that it will begin making serious deficiencies letters publicly available through EDGAR shortly after they are issued by Corp Fin. Corp Fin selectively reviews certain registration statements or offering documents to monitor and enhance compliance with the applicable disclosure and accounting requirements. Corp Fin generally makes the review correspondence publicly available through EDGAR no sooner than 20 business days after we complete a filing review.
In some cases, however, a registration statement or offering document is so deficient that Corp Fin sends the issuer a letter informing it that we are deferring our review of the filing until it is amended to resolve the deficiencies. Corp Fin indicated that consistent with its “ongoing efforts to enhance the transparency of our review process, we intend to make these letters publicly available through EDGAR shortly after we issue them. This will make it clear that the Division believes the filing under consideration is not minimally compliant with statutory or regulatory requirements.”
These letters will appear in companies’ filing histories as “SEC STAFF LETTER: SERIOUS DEFICIENCIES.” Corp Fin indicated that it will begin by publishing letters issued on June 15, 2018 and later. The letters will be disseminated via EDGAR within 10 calendar days of issuance.